• ProfessorScience@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re really playing up the ominous tone.

    “We know this because your IP address — xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx — was the first thing your device sent us. We know the rest of it. We chose not to display it. Most pages would not have made that choice. We did not ask for your location. Your address arrived before you did.”

    Uh, yeah. That’s how IP addresses work.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      We sent a SYN-ACK packet and YOU acknowledged it, confirming you are not spoofing YOUR IP address. Now WE share the same sequence number. Most sites do not tell you this is happening.

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      dude be careful, right now your house is probably broadcasting a street address.

      the mailman that drops your mail off? he knows

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Compare this to Google’s homepage, which is clean, wholesome, friendly, and inviting.

      (I don’t mind sites that try to scare the user straight, but this one definitely has the unmistakable tinge of AI-generated wording. Make a sense if you click through the links at the bottom to see who created it.)

      • morto@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It really looks ai-generated. It even contains mistakes like saying that my 5yo phone model with low resolution is a high end device. All the text is pretty “generic” and sloppy

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am pretty sure 90% of the people using the Internet don’t know what an IP address is.

  • Watermark710@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It got my location wrong. It got my GPU wrong. It said I never left the tab, even though I left it to start this comment. It said I moved my cursor 111 times in 74 seconds, which is absolutely false.

    That site is just pointless. Pretty much the only things it got right were my time zone and my browser.

  • wampus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Heheh, a whole lot of mocking in this thread, but I don’t mind the site / its display.

    Yeah, it’s overly melodramatic in its setup, and a bunch of the information doomerism is silly in terms of the info basically being required to provide data comms etc. It also tends to get things a bit wrong in a few categories – like for me, it said I was in a totally different city (still the right country at least - Canada), then it said my time zone was in iceland, which is kinda… no.

    But the general message of the site, and the awareness its trying to raise in regards to how much data gets shared for basic comms establishment, and how that information gets used to fingerprint people, is worthwhile.

  • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Laughing my ass off reading through this. The sanctimonious and passive aggressive threatening tone is perfect for how much info it got wrong just because I use Firefox and an adblock. YOUR BROWSER DIDN’T TELL US ANYTHING ABOUT THIS, LIKELY BECAUSE ITS FIREFOX. BUT THAT MEANS WE KNOW YOU USE FIREFOX AND WE ARE CHOOSING TO BE SAFE WITH THAT INFO, YOURE WELCOME, PWNED!!!11!1111!1

    Teaching people about fingerprinting and how important understanding it is for personal privacy is good, but acting like a 4chan script kiddy group and making bizarre empty threats like you’re mr robot ain’t it, dawg.

    From other comments this is likely some AI slop to sell a product, but if they’re serious they come off like they just slept through sec+ and think they’re shadow brokers now lmao

    • spizzat2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Similar results with NoScript.

      This volume requires JavaScript. That is part of the point — your browser is what is being read.

      With JavaScript off, the page cannot tell you what your browser disclosed. The data is still there. The disclosure still happened. Only the telling of it stops.

      The fact that they’re stopped from “the telling” says a lot about their abilities, but not much about “the disclosure”.

      I imagine it was just stuff collected in most server logs: IP Address, user agent string… I’m not too concerned, really.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Looks like they don’t have a dedicated backend dev. A similar presentation could be done by making it a dynamically generated page, with some CSS animations.