Firefox says it will keep supporting uBlock Origin even as Microsoft Edge and other Chromium browsers phase it out under Manifest V3.

  • Victoria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    If they ever stop supporting it I will continue to use the last version to support it, any website that breaks compatibility with this Firefox version can get fucked.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s a significant security risk, unfortunately.

      If that happens, I’d suggest a fork with a built in blocker, one that still gets security patches from upstream Firefox.

      • America@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Exactly. Ublock origin is notable only for being part of 0 ad companies and 100% trustworthy. The blocking lists are universal. If it’s built into the browser, you’re golden

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Well…

          With a fork, one is very dependent on the browser dev. Not just on their benevolence, but on their security practices too. And on them pulling in upstream security patches, quickly.

          TBH, this is why I do finance stuff on vanilla Firefox. I love browser forks, I really do, but I’m a bit more cautious with them, too.

        • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          i mean… blocking lists are universal, but the other features ublock offers are not - i’m making heavy use of ublock’s dynamic filtering panel and per-site switches. one important thing i use ublock for is to whitelist which sites get javascript permissions and to get rid of remote fonts to make pages more readable. those features need manifest v2.

          if firefox drops manifest v2 and you’re relying purely on those inbuilt blocking lists then you might as well use the manifest v3 version of ublock without seeing a difference, right?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        librewolf does not have much developer capacity to maintain such heavy patches. you may remember some chromium forks telling they will maintain a patch when google completely removes this API from chromium, but it seems none of them will follow through. I can’t really fault them because it is likely a gargantuan task. but I’ll fault them for claiming something they (should) have known they can’t deliver. but my point is if vivaldi and others can’t keep it, how could librewolf?

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’ll just spend my reading time reading more books than I do now. Forcing me to look at ads will not work.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can’t imagine using the web without firefox and ublock. Even the cookie consent popups are awful.

    • LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seriously. I clear my cookies on Firefox exit because I don’t want their shit on my computer if it isn’t needed.

      This would cause me to see them every single damn time.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, the user experience of “just wipe cookies on browser exit” is a lot better than “have a million prompts all over zillions of sites”.

        However, regarding “every single damn time”…some sites can have their “do you want cookies” popup just blocked by the Firefox I still don’t care about cookies addon. It’s not a solution for every site out there, but it’ll get a lot of them.

        It’s also possible to use another extension, Behind the Overlay on some sites. This does require a click, so manual action, but it tries to identify “pop-over” content that covers up the browser window and remove it with that click. It’s really intended as a more-general solution to “pop-over” stuff, but cookie pop-ups often take this form and can be dismissed.

        • refreeze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can also just enable one of the “Cookie notices” lists in your ublock settings, no need for another extension.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ublock Lite still works in Chrome (and it still blocks YouTube ads, not sure about cookie popups), but you get no control over the filters. Just a slider with some presets to choose from. So while better than nothing, just stick with Firefox.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Now that MV2 is dead in chrome, i wouldn’t bet on YouTube ads being able to be blocked by UBlock Lite for much longer.

  • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    So, I can finally point and laugh at the people who were saying that the manifest V3 thing was a non issue because their ad blocker was still working ?

  • mbirth 🇬🇧@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Instead of uBlock Origin rather use AdNauseam. It’s basically uBlock Origin, but it “clicks” on the blocked ads so the ad networks still have to pay website owners.

  • TWeaK@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Alternate headline: Firefox is now the only browser worth using.

    And in any case, lumping Firefox as one browser is disingenuous. There are numerous Firefox forks, just like every other major browser is in fact a Google Chromium fork.

  • TehWorld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pihole. Doesn’t solve everything, but I’m currently blocking ads from just over a half million domains.

  • Ripley_Tripley@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    For everyone using Firefox, are you using it with microG or some type of sandbox? Even when going private, you can’t download it unless you have Google Play services on mobile. Ive tried to see if it works without google and unfortunately it dosent. If that’s the case for mobile, then technically we really shouldn’t be using it either.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are those of us who are using Firefox on the desktop. No Google Play anywhere in sight. And on the phone I am one of the odd ones using the Gecko engine based native Sailfish OS browser.

      • Ripley_Tripley@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thats what I do too. But for mobile, currently I’m using DuckDuckGo until I find something that can work right on this phone. The default browser for this phone is garbage and Iv been trying to find an alternative since then.

  • bullsworth@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sometimes I think it was a mistake to let the programs we primarily use to view text and images become bloated virtual machines that execute megabytes of arbitrary code with every page load.

        • motruck@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It came before bard was renamed to gemini. Kind of like people who were referred to as Isis before you know, Isis.

              • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Hmm, interesting. That makes me think of someone whose last name was literally “Gay” before gayness as a news headliner broke out, I think right around the turn of the century. Her family changed their name to “Gray” as a result.

                I wonder if a name change might have been or even might be helpful for that person you know.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        What is mediocre about it? What would be an example of a good browser, and what are the differences?

        • Carl@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nothing is mediocre about it. All of the “best” browsers are based on FF’s Gecko engine. Maybe they have complaints about Mozilla or the weird stuff they’ve been doing with FF recently. But the actual Gecko engine is solid, and it’s what all the best browsers are based on.

        • deepfryerdan@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          im an old web dev and im stuck in my shitty ways which includes not liking how ff is the only effing browser that takes extra effort to make the front-end look and function correctly. tbh, i do use ff on android 99% of the time, but ff on desktop breaks too many sites if you have any inkling of ff’s security turned on.

          im not wrong, you all are just fanboys

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If it goes… I don’t know what I’ll do.

    Go out and touch grass probably.

    Get a hobby.

    Perfect my molotov recipe.

    • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Come on, the meme format requires you to put another normal sentence at the end right after the provocative one lol.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I meant… Robot molotov. With AI. And cloud. And blockchain integration.

        I don’t know what I’m doing I hope that will suffice.

        Wait what meme format.

        • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m just messing around. I was thinking of a 4-panel comic in which a person does chores, like vacuuming, handling laundry, and the 2nd-to-last panel is something like, “Dread one’s short existence,” before finishing with another humdrum task in the style of the other panels. I can’t find the comic despite trying, unfortunately!

  • Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A misleading title shilling for Firefox. Brave has full support and it won’t even remove it nor does it actually need it as it has its own in-house fully hard coded adblock that doesn’t need Google services whatsoever.

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How many braveshillings did you get for this comment?

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    We should introduce Manifest V4 that would undo all damage V3 did.