Did anyone let them know that reproduction harms the environment?
Im also a gun vegan, a car vegan, a facebook vegan, an exercise vegan (unfortunately), a windows vegan, … just not actual vegan.
I feel like thats a bad way to use the word vegan.
“Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn’t use AI”
This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users “Windows vegans”.
Choosing to not use AI isn’t some wacky contrarian position, it’s a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don’t want to use AI? Then don’t.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.
I hate the term AI vegan. I prefer mistechnitinoimosyne. More classy.
Missed opportunity to coin the term “Aitheist” Fools.
There has to be a catchier name than AI vegans…
The better term would be “LLM gobbling fuckheads” for those who use that stuff and believe it has anything to do with “AI”
“refuse” lol as if there were a general requirement to use this shit
We don’t need to invent new terms, like ‘AI Vegan’, when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.
People who use the term “vegan” for somebody they consider extremist, ascetic, or annoying are really telling on themselves.
Side note: one of the most genius rebrands of all time was the way fake leather (which is often made from polyurethane, a type of plastic) suddenly became aspirational “vegan leather”.
Most vegan leathers are made from compostable materials, because (surprise, surprise!) many vegans are also environmentalists.
Journalists constantly trying to be the origin of a term.
“AI vegans”? I knew guardian was already bought by tech bros, but wtf is that phrasing lmao I dont use AI either, simply because it is wrong more often than not and I am still capable of googling myself, but being cautious equals to being vegan in tech bro eyes?
how to belittle and minimize a very serious thing: call any protesters of it a " ___ vegan"
ha so I’m a double vegan
